Article | REF: R6741 V1

Comparison of grating size measurements for AFM and SEM calibration

Authors: Alexandra DELVALLÉE, Sébastien DUCOURTIEUX

Publication date: December 10, 2022

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


Overview

Français

Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.

Read the article

AUTHORS

  • Alexandra DELVALLÉE: Research engineer - Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais (LNE), Photonics-Energetics Division, nanometrology team, Trappes, France

  • Sébastien DUCOURTIEUX: Research engineer - Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais (LNE), Photonics-Energetics Division, nanometrology team, Trappes, France

 INTRODUCTION

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) have become essential instruments, particularly for measuring the dimensions of nanoscale networks and objects. They are widely used in both industry and academia. However, to provide metrologically reliable information (traceable to the International System of Units, SI) and therefore comparable, these instruments need to be periodically calibrated using reference networks that are themselves calibrated.

After calibration, and in order to verify the accuracy of the measurement returned by the instrument, a comparison exercise can also be initiated. To this end, the user compares his measurements with those delivered by another user, another instrument or another laboratory.

This type of comparison can be launched on a much larger scale to verify the measurement capabilities of a set of users on a national or even international scale.

For AFM and MEB, these comparisons are generally initiated by metrology institutes, with participants often familiar with the concepts of uncertainty and traceability at . These comparisons are based on very strict protocols discussed between institutes.

In France, despite the country's highly developed range of instruments, no such comparison had been launched before 2014. For this reason, the "Instrumentation" working group of the Club nanoMétrologie, following numerous requests from its members, has set up a national intercomparison campaign to measure the dimensional characteristics of standard arrays by AFM and SEM. This club, created in 2011 and piloted by the Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais (LNE) and the Centre national de compétences en nanosciences du CNRS (C'Nano – CNRS), is a national network of academic, industrial and institutional players involved in nanometrology, with over 400 members by 2022.

The aim of this comparison was to take stock of AFM and SEM measurement capabilities in France, on a reference sample, including instruments from different equipment manufacturers, integrated in various laboratories and for a panel...

You do not have access to this resource.

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference

A Comprehensive Knowledge Base, with over 1,200 authors and 100 scientific advisors
+ More than 10,000 articles and 1,000 how-to sheets, over 800 new or updated articles every year
From design to prototyping, right through to industrialization, the reference for securing the development of your industrial projects

This article is included in

Mechanical and dimensional measurements

This offer includes:

Knowledge Base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

Practical Path

Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills

Doc & Quiz

Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading

Subscribe now!

Ongoing reading
Comparison of grating size measurements for AFM and SEM calibration