Overview
FrançaisABSTRACT
Drone operations at low level now appear to form a large part of the current and future market for these systems. However, their use is still limited by security issues such as incursion into prohibited areas, and safety concerns such as risk of collision with other aircraft. This article presents a concept of operation and a system designed to manage drone traffic to mitigate collision risk and track drones used for malevolent operations. The components of the system, its architecture and its human-machine interfaces are described, and simulations and preliminary flight test results are presented.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHORS
-
Claude LE TALLEC: Project Manager - ONERA – The French Aerospace Lab, Palaiseau, France
-
Patrick LE BLAYE: Research engineer - ONERA – The French Aerospace Lab, Salon-de-Provence, France
INTRODUCTION
Air traffic management has been a constant preoccupation of aviation authorities since the advent of transport aviation. It aims to ensure flight safety, notably by separating aircraft from each other, and air traffic efficiency by optimizing traffic flows. It also provides services for airspace users.
Drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles, are a new category of aircraft.
Taking advantage of advances in digital technologies, their development is now exponential, for both leisure and professional applications. However, the emergence of these new airspace users raises flight safety issues for other users, and poses a threat to the safety of certain installations and to the privacy of citizens. The safe and efficient integration of drones into air traffic is therefore a concern for the entire aeronautical community, government authorities and economic players alike.
The Riga declaration (see box) has been welcomed by drone operators eager to be able to routinely carry out missions below 150 meters above ground level in airspace that is generally uncontrolled away from airports and controlled close to them. Flying in these areas without the ability to see and avoid, and without any assistance from air traffic controllers, is such a challenge that drones do not obtain routine flight clearance unless they are in sight of the remote pilot, or have observers who retain a direct view of the drone and its environment.
Even though most aircraft do not fly at very low altitudes, use of the low layer of airspace is not sufficiently rare to satisfy safety objectives set by regulators. To solve this problem, we propose adaptations to the structure of the airspace and its rules of use.
The current European airspace management architecture has been defined for pilot-on-board aircraft operations. This architecture has been put in place to manage airspace from low levels near airports to medium and high altitudes throughout Europe, leaving a large portion of low-level airspace uncontrolled. This uncontrolled part of the airspace is used by many types of manned traffic, operating either under visual flight rules or instrument flight rules. Pilots manage this part of the airspace by visually observing other traffic and keeping a safe distance, in accordance with the rules of the air.
The recent rapid increase in drone traffic must be taken into account to integrate these machines into the airspace without adversely affecting other traffic. UAVs can be of any type and size, and their missions can take place in any class of airspace at any altitude. However, the concept of low-level drone operation described in this article is mainly dedicated to airspace below 500 feet above ground level....
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
KEYWORDS
drones | air traffic management | electronic identification | UAS | flight safety
This article is included in
Aerospace systems
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Low-level drone traffic management
Bibliography
Websites
UAVNET Thematic Network http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/61170_en.html
CAPECON project http://www.cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/63495_en.html
Standards and norms
- Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems. - NF-ISO 9241-210 - Janv. 2011
Regulations
Arrêté du 17 décembre 2015 relatif à l'utilisation de l'espace aérien par les aéronefs qui circulent sans personne à bord. DEVA1528542A
Decree of December 17, 2015 on the design of civil aircraft that circulate without a person on board, the conditions of their use and the capabilities required of the persons who use them. DEVA1528469A
Law 2016/1428 of October 24, 2016 on the...
Patents
ONERA. Patent no. 98 08606 "Device for improving aircraft safety under visual flight rules". July 06, 1998. US Patent 6438492 B1, July 2, 1999.
Directory
Organizations – Federations – Associations (non-exhaustive list)
Council for Civilian Drones (CDC). https://www.ecologique-solidaire.gouv.fr/conseil-drones-civils
Fédération professionnelle du Drone civil (FPDC). http://www.federation-drone.org
...Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference