Overview
![](/assets/images/picto-drapeau-france-3a76576a5d60a512053b4612ab58dae5.png)
ABSTRACT
From choice of raw materials to formulation, sensory evaluation has become a major method to ensure product quality and development in the intensely competitive field of cosmetics. Today it offers a decision-making tool for innovation in this sector. This article explains the physiological principles underlying the process of sensory evaluation of cosmetic products. Discriminative, descriptive, and hedonic methods are described in a practical way to facilitate understanding. The newer sensory methods (Flash, Pivot ©, CATA) are illustrated, with examples of cosmetic products. The article concludes with examples of the sensory evaluation approach.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Anne-Marie PENSE-LHERITIER: Doctor of Pharmaceutical Sciences, HDR. Head of Formulation Division - School of Industrial Biology, France
INTRODUCTION
Product innovation in the cosmetics world must meet this challenge: bringing to market cosmetics that are adapted to the needs and desires of consumers. To meet these expectations, product performance must integrate efficacy, safety and sensoriality. The first two criteria, which are assessed through in vitro or clinical tests, are not always immediately perceived by consumers. Sensoriality, on the other hand, is expressed from the very first contact with the product.
The cognitive process that takes place when the consumer interacts with the cosmetic product can be summarized in two key stages.
stage 1: the consumer uses his sensory system to perceive the organic properties of the product, such as its color, smell and texture;
step 2: information is integrated to generate a perception that can give the product a symbolic value.
The evaluation of products by the sensory system is therefore a prerequisite for their acceptability or rejection.
Companies that are capable of both designing products that are discriminating in sensory terms, and carrying out the appropriate studies to address these issues, can create a competitive advantage and increase their chances of success. Sensory evaluation, the study of the organic characteristics of cosmetic products by the human senses, has thus become the framework for product development. By comparing and quantifying the sensory descriptors of products and assessing consumer preferences, it helps translate expectations into clear specifications for a given cosmetic product.
Sensory evaluation uses different methodological approaches, depending on whether it focuses on the consumer (hedonic) or the product (analytical). Consumer expectations are assessed through preference tests with panels of users of this product category.
The information that discriminates or characterizes the sensory qualities of products is obtained with a panel of experts trained and validated for the method used. These analytical methods can be broken down into two categories to meet different objectives.
Conventionally, the quantitative descriptive profile method is the most widely used to characterize the sensory universes of cosmetic products. Its performance enables us to qualify the visual, textural and olfactory sensory images of cosmetics, using appropriate lexicons. The sensory profile is often the guarantee of compliance with specifications during development and throughout the product's life. However, other, so-called alternative methods can be used for initial sample sorting (free sorting), to quickly compare products with one another (flash profile,...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
![](/assets/images/logo-eti-286623ed91fa802ce039246e516e5852.png)
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
KEYWORDS
formulation | sensation
This article is included in
Formulation
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Sensory evaluation and cosmetics
Bibliography
Software tools
Fizz (Biosystèmes) (France) http://www.biosystemes.com
Tastel, ABT Informatique (France) http://www.abt-sensory-analysis.com
Events
The Eurosense European Congress is held every two years in even-numbered years. http://www.eurosense.elsevier.com
The Pangborn International Congress is held every two years in odd-numbered years. http://www.pangbornsymposium.com/default.asp
...Standards and norms
- Sensory analysis – Vocabulary – Triangular test - NF ISO 4120 - 2004
- Sensory analysis – Vocabulary - NF EN ISO 5492 - 2009
- Sensory analysis – Methodology – Pairwise comparison test - NF ISO 5495 - 2004
- Sensory analysis – Methodology – General guidelines for creating a sensory profile - NF EN ISO 13299 - 2010
- Sensory analysis – Methodology – Ranking - NF ISO 8587 - 2007
- Guide d'application...
Directory
Organizations – Federations – Associations (non-exhaustive list)
Société française d'analyse sensorielle – Sensory analysis and evaluation http://www.sfasenso.fr/
E3S European Sensory Science Society http://www.e3sensory.eu/
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
![](/assets/images/logo-eti-286623ed91fa802ce039246e516e5852.png)
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference