Article | REF: C2554 V2

Steel components in bending ? Beam joints. Component method

Author: Maël COUCHAUX

Publication date: August 10, 2015

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


Overview

Français

ABSTRACT

Assemblies of bending elements are key components in steel structures. The design of the joints, whether clamped (endplate) or pinned (web cleat) is problematic. This paper deals only with connections between members. It describes the component method and the equivalent T-stub method, two new concepts introduced in Eurocode 3 to allow the resistance and rigidity of these connections to be evaluated.

Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.

Read the article

AUTHOR

  • Maël COUCHAUX: Doctorate in Civil Engineering from INSA Rennes - Research project manager at CTICM

 INTRODUCTION

In practice, bent connections in steel construction are designed in two different ways.

The first is to guarantee continuity between two beams, or between a beam and a column. These connections are made either by bolting plates perpendicular to the beams, or by bolting covers to the flanges and web of the beams. They transfer a significant moment.

The second design consists in not ensuring continuity at the fasteners, thus leaving the beam free to rotate on its supports. These connections, which are fairly simple to manufacture and install, are often made using double angles bolted to the load-bearing element and the supported beam.

In France, the adoption of the Eurocodes has led to changes in the way this type of connection is calculated, notably with the introduction of the component method. While this method provides a means of calculating the resistance of beam connections (bending moment, shear force), it also introduces the concept of semi-rigidity, which makes it possible to characterize the deformability of connections and their influence on the overall behavior of the structure. Consequently, it is necessary to justify the modeling assumption for connections which, in practice, are generally considered to be articulated or embedded.

In this article, the component method is presented in a general way, before being applied to beam connections using bolted end plates. The case of hinged beam connections is then considered. For each of these two types of connection, the different constructive arrangements used in practice are explained, and the calculation methodology is illustrated by means of simple examples.

Column foot connections, another particularly important category of fastener, are the subject of a separate article (see [C 2 557] ).

You do not have access to this resource.

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference

A Comprehensive Knowledge Base, with over 1,200 authors and 100 scientific advisors
+ More than 10,000 articles and 1,000 how-to sheets, over 800 new or updated articles every year
From design to prototyping, right through to industrialization, the reference for securing the development of your industrial projects

KEYWORDS

resistance   |   Components and structure   |   Eurocode 3   |   civil engineering   |   connections


This article is included in

The superstructure of the building

This offer includes:

Knowledge Base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

Practical Path

Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills

Doc & Quiz

Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading

Subscribe now!

Ongoing reading
Bent metal components