Overview
FrançaisABSTRACT
Column bases of steel structures form the interface between steel constructions and their reinforced concrete foundations. The design of pinned or clamped column bases has a very marked impact on the steel structure and the foundations. Eurocode 3 introduces new concepts such as the T-stub method for calculating the resistance of pinned/clamped column bases, and also the justification of the modeling hypothesis.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Maël COUCHAUX: Doctorate in civil engineering from INSA Rennes - Research project manager at CTICM
INTRODUCTION
Post feet can be designed as hinged or embedded, which has a significant impact on the price of the steel structure and foundations.
In the building industry, it is common practice to weld a plate to the end of a column and to connect it to the foundation by means of two or even four anchor rods, but placed at or near the axis of the same column. This type of column foot is then considered nominally articulated, and this design remains sufficient as long as the rotations are not too great. In the opposite case, when greater rotations are required, other devices such as grains or clevises with hinge pins can be used, the aim being to achieve a bearing design that conforms to the assumptions made in modeling the structure.
Eurocode 3 makes it possible to calculate the resistance of column feet subjected to tensile or compressive stress using the component method, which in this case is fairly easy to use. The justification of the articulation hypothesis, made necessary by the Eurocode, is based on constructive provisions that were already present in the French rules (Lescouarc'h's work...). for example). The first part of this article deals with the design and calculation of articulated column feet.
When it becomes difficult to comply with ELS displacement criteria (e.g. presence of an overhead crane), it is sometimes common to use embedded column feet. The resistance of embedded column feet is then calculated using the component method, which is no more complex to use than traditional methods. The requirement to justify that these attachments can be modeled as rigid does, however, give rise to some difficulties. The second part of this article deals with the case of column feet embedded in end plates.
For each of these two parts, an example illustrates the approach.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
KEYWORDS
resistance | stiffness | Components and structure | civil engineering | connections
This article is included in
The superstructure of the building
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Bent metal components
Bibliography
Standards and norms
- Eurocode 2 – Design of concrete structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. - NF EN 1992-1-1 AFNOR - Octobre 2005
- Eurocode 2 – Design of concrete structures. Part 4: Design and calculation of concrete fasteners. - Pr NF EN 1992-4 AFNOR - Septembre 2013
- Eurocode 3 – Design of steel structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. - NF EN 1993-1-1 AFNOR - Octobre 2005 ...
Organizations – Federations – Associations
-
AFNOR – Association française de normalisation,
-
APK – Association for the promotion of steel construction education,
...
Software
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference