Overview
ABSTRACT
To guarantee the fatigue strength of any structure without an excessive margin is a challenge for all designers. Once a material’s behavior is characterized, the structural modeling/testing method defined and the fatigue criteria established, the main difficulty is to determine the fatigue design loads. In this article, the three strategies used in a mechanical engineering context are described. The objective is to evaluate and quantify the usage conditions and corresponding fatigue loads, and then to derive the design loads on the system, subsystems and components. Three examples of applications are presented according to the maximalist, semiprobabilistic or reliability design approaches.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHORS
-
Commission Fatigue de la SF2M: French Society for Metallurgy and Materials
-
André BIGNONNET: Structural fatigue and durability consultant, André Bignonnet Consulting
-
Rémy CHIERAGATTI: Institut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace (ISAE)
-
Bruno COLIN: Vibration fatigue expert, Nexter Systems
-
Stéphan COURTIN: Fatigue expert, AREVA
-
Michel HUTHER: ITG consultant (former deputy marine technical director at Bureau Veritas)
-
Mac-Lan NGUYEN-TAJAN: Innovation and Research Division, SNCF
-
Fabien SZMYTKA: Research and Innovation Department, PSA Peugeot Citroën
INTRODUCTION
Fatigue is damage that occurs in structures subjected to time-varying loads. This damage is characterized by the development of cracks, leading to loss of functionality or sudden failure of the part. Faced with this phenomenon, design offices need to dimension structures to ensure their operation for a given duration and under given conditions of use. Two approaches are considered, depending on the performance and safety requirements of the part in the structure, and the context of use (system with or without regular maintenance).
The first imposes a guaranteed or safe service life without intermediate testing, which requires that cracks are not initiated.
The second is part of a more general approach known as damage tolerance, and aims to control the existence and development of cracks by guaranteeing non-rupture in service between two inspections.
The models associated with these approaches are based on experimental databases that incorporate more or less influential parameters. The basic database for the first approach is based on specimens subjected to cyclic loading at constant amplitude and frequency during the test. The number of cycles to failure or crack detection is the main experimental input. By collecting the results of tests carried out at various load amplitudes, it is possible to construct Wöhler curves describing the number of cycles to failure as a function of the variation in load amplitude. The second approach is based on tests on pre-cracked specimens subjected to loads of constant amplitude. They provide the cracking rate as a function of the variation in the stress intensity factor ΔK. The curve describing the variation in cracking speed as a function of this factor has a linear part in a logarithmic diagram that can be described by a power law known as the Paris law.
The study of the Wöhler and Paris curves highlights two major points from the point of view of this article:
high sensitivity of the number of cycles to failure to load amplitude. A small variation in load amplitude results in a large variation in the number of cycles to failure, or in a large variation in the rate of propagation of an existing crack. In fact, the variation is exponential;
a wide dispersion in the number of cycles to failure at a given load amplitude.
Most design models seek to establish equivalences between the situation of the structure to be designed and the test parameters associated with the database. This obviously requires knowledge of the situation. In many fields, however, this knowledge is very imperfect. It is at this stage that the concept of representative loading or that of the safety...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
KEYWORDS
Reliability | fatigue design | fatigue loads | structural durability
This article is included in
Mechanical functions and components
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Defining fatigue loads
Bibliography
Bibliography
Standards and norms
- Demonstrating environmental resistance. Designing and carrying out environmental tests – Part 3: Application of the customization approach in a mechanical environment - NF X 50-144-3 - 2014
- Metal products – Fatigue under stress of varying amplitude – Rain-Flow method for counting cycles - AFNOR A03-406 - 10-93
- Règles de conception et de construction des matériels mécaniques des îlots nucléaires REP, Afcen,...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference