Overview
![](/assets/images/picto-drapeau-france-3a76576a5d60a512053b4612ab58dae5.png)
ABSTRACT
Soils are reemerging in discussions about the development of our countryside and cities, with the goal of achieving zero net artificialization of soils (ZAN) by 2050. Despite the attention given to soils, the situation continues to deteriorate. ZAN appears as a new constraint on the development of regions. Couldn't it, on the contrary, present an opportunity to establish a theoretical and practical framework for considering transformations commensurate with the challenges? By intersecting the histories and theories of disciplines concerned with soils, hypotheses are formulated to define a soil-based urban planning.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Patrick HENRY: Architect and urban planner - Professor TPCAU - Urban practices - ensa Paris-Belleville, IPRAUS laboratory (UMR AUSser 3329), France
INTRODUCTION
Numerous voices are warning of the rapid degradation of soils worldwide by human activities: urban sprawl, disappearance of agricultural land, scarcity of resources, erosion of biodiversity, pollution, etc. are all topical issues in which soils play a predominant role, often to their disadvantage.
Having reached the end of the Soil Decade begun in 2015, the European Union has set a Soil Strategy 2030, which aims to ensure that all soils are in good condition by 2050, and that soil protection, restoration and sustainable use become the norm. . In France, soil is making a comeback in debates on the planning of our countryside and cities, as evidenced by the revision of the World Soil Charter or the 2021 Climate and Resilience Act with the goal of zero net artificialization of soils (ZAN) to be achieved by 2050.
So much attention and determination for a situation that continues to deteriorate: in France, between 20,000 and 30,000 hectares are artificially developed every year. This artificialisation is increasing at almost four times the rate of population growth. and has direct repercussions on the quality of life of citizens, but also on the environment. Essentially quantitative, ZAN appears to be an objective without doctrine, understood as a new constraint on regional development.
While the aim is to preserve the soil, there is little mention of what will be achieved from this laudable objective. The question of the urban forms that will result from soil conservation is rarely raised. Will we continue to "produce" the same developments, the same neighborhoods, the same buildings?
Beyond the injunction to do things differently, to consider urban planning differently, don't we need to create a theoretical and practical framework to envisage transformations that are commensurate with the stakes?
Soil provides not only the support, but also the substrate for these new project approaches. Because ZAN is not just an obligation. It's a radical upheaval in the way we do things and, above all, in the way we look at situations that we haven't yet come to grips with. Like other disciplines, urban planning needs to rethink itself in order to respond to the issues facing territories and their human and non-human populations.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
![](/assets/images/logo-eti-286623ed91fa802ce039246e516e5852.png)
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
KEYWORDS
biodiversity | Urban planning | territory | soils | transition
This article is included in
Ecological engineering
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Towards soil-based urban planning: challenges and recommendations for city planners
Bibliography
Regulations
(non-exhaustive list)
Law no. 2000-1208 of December 13, 2000 on urban solidarity and renewal (JORF no. 289 of December 14, 2000), known as the "SRU Law".
Loi n° 2010-788 du 12 juillet 2010 portant engagement national pour l'environnement (JORF n° 0160 du 13 juillet 2010), known as the "Grenelle 2" law.
Law no. 2014-366 of March 24, 2014 for access to...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
![](/assets/images/logo-eti-286623ed91fa802ce039246e516e5852.png)
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference