Overview
FrançaisABSTRACT
Despite impacts on the environment, biodiversity and health, viticultural practices change little. The vine, its image, the actors, the standards, the public are obstacles to change. Scientific disciplines overly isolated themselves from each other and from the society to the point of losing the capacity to incorporate other forms of knowledge and reasoning. The article describes a participatory action-research mobilizing winegrowers, ngos, advisors, elected officials, citizens and researchers. Its epistemological framework values disagreements and different reasoning. A consensus is elaborated. Scientific knowledge and mobilization for action in the vineyards are produced simultaneously. A reflection is proposed on the relations between engineers and stakeholders, for co-designing projects.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Jean-Eugène MASSON: Research Director, UMR SVQV INRAE, Centre Grand Est - Colmar
INTRODUCTION
The challenges of sustainable development are widely recognized, yet the agenda is constantly being postponed. Among the human activities impacting on the environment, intensive agriculture, which uses pesticides, is increasingly criticized . Winegrowing, with 7.5 million hectares of vines cultivated worldwide, enjoys a reputation based on the quality of its wines and the landscapes it shapes for tourism; hedonism and economic success are associated with it. However, this same viticulture is one of the agricultural sectors that makes the greatest use of pesticides with the greatest environmental impact, such as herbicides applied to the soil or synthetic pesticides used to combat vine diseases and insects, on 89% of the world's cultivated surface area for conventional practices. Organic and biodynamic viticultural practices (10% and 1% of acreage respectively), on the other hand, have a reputation for lower environmental impact, as they use natural products rather than herbicides to ensure the health of the vines. Faced with this situation, society is increasingly mobilized against conventional viticulture practices, even taking them to court. However, the proportion of vineyards in all countries has changed very little over the years. While of all the levers of action for sustainable development – even to reduce CO 2 emissions and even fix CO 2 in plants and soils – agriculture is undoubtedly one of the strongest, why is the situation evolving only very slowly? What are the constraints to change?
Some constraints are linked to the vines grown, all of which are susceptible to disease, and to the fact that they must remain in place for more than 15 years to produce quality wines. Others are linked to increasingly frequent climatic disturbances, aggravating disease pressure and reducing vine longevity ( https://www.plan-deperissement-vigne.fr/ ). Wine industry regulations, economic realities, standard winegrowing advice and training are evolving far too little, and are therefore also constraints to change. Winegrowers are caught up in a complex system of constraints that...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Eco-design and sustainable innovation
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Imagining and carrying out sociotechnical projects in participatory action research: an example in viticulture
Bibliography
- (1) - SPRINGMANN (M.), CLARK (M.), MASON-D'CROZ (D.), WIEBE (K.), BODIRSKY (B.L.), LASSALETTA (L.), DE VRIES (W.), VERMEULEN (S.J.), HERRERO (M.), CARLSON (K.M.), JONELL (M.), TROELL (M.), DECLERCK (F.), GORDON (L.J.), ZURAYK (R.), SCARBOROUGH (P.), RAYNER (M.), LOKEN (B.), FANZO (J.), GODFRAY (H.C.J.), TILMAN (D.), ROCKSTRÖM (J.), WILLETT (W.) - Options for...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference