Article | REF: R7142 V1

Modeling and identification of a steelmaking process

Authors: Jacques RICHALET, Denis STIEVENART

Publication date: July 10, 1994, Review date: September 16, 2024

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


Overview

Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.

Read the article

AUTHORS

  • Jacques RICHALET: Civil aeronautical engineer (École nationale supérieure de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace) - Master of Sciences, Berkeley (USA) - Doctor of Science, Paris - Scientific Director, ADERSA (Association pour le développement de l'enseignement et de la recherche en systématique appliquée)

  • Denis STIEVENART: Civil engineer from Mons Polytechnic (Belgium) - Instrumentation Engineer, Automation and Instrumentation Department (Sollac DK)

 INTRODUCTION

TAB (Tout au Barillet) coking ovens are highly disturbed units. Starting with coal and firing at high temperature, they have to produce steelmaking coke and coke oven gas, which, along with the furnaces' charging and discharging cycles, are supplied at highly variable rates and in sharp bursts. These gases, coming from a battery of furnaces, are collected in large pipes known as "barrels", which flow into a large manifold; the latter carries the production to a washing and purification unit.

The quest for improved performance and environmental constraints make it necessary to improve barrel pressure regulation.

Indeed, if this pressure is lower than atmospheric pressure, air inlets risk creating internal combustions, and if the pressure is too high, leaks, which are inevitably always present in this type of installation, risk releasing noxious gases into the atmosphere. To strictly meet these objectives, high-performance control is required.

The controllers traditionally used on this type of process by ordinary steelworks are of the standard PID type, but this control technique is at the limit of its potential if the performance targets are increased in the current drive for competitiveness.

Given the multivariable, non-linear and highly disturbed nature of the process, a predictive control system is required, capable of taking the measured disturbances as a trend a priori, as is the case here. The advantages of this type of control are well known [3] : robustness, performance, ease of adjustment, constraints taken into account, etc., which is why it is rapidly spreading to all industrial sectors, both slow (e.g. furnaces) and fast (e.g. rolling mills). However, it also has its drawbacks: it requires a specific computer, and is based on the use of a predictive model which, in this case, needs to be developed and identified.

This text follows on from article [R 7 140] (see archive) "Process modeling and identification", of which it is an example of application. Readers should therefore first familiarize themselves with this text.

You do not have access to this resource.

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference

A Comprehensive Knowledge Base, with over 1,200 authors and 100 scientific advisors
+ More than 10,000 articles and 1,000 how-to sheets, over 800 new or updated articles every year
From design to prototyping, right through to industrialization, the reference for securing the development of your industrial projects

This article is included in

Control and systems engineering

This offer includes:

Knowledge Base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

Practical Path

Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills

Doc & Quiz

Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading

Subscribe now!

Ongoing reading
Modeling and identification of a steelmaking process