Article | REF: M135 V1

Corrosion fatigue testing

Author: Henri-Paul LIEURADE

Publication date: June 10, 1998

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


Overview

Français

Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.

Read the article

AUTHOR

  • Henri-Paul LIEURADE: Engineer from the Centre d'études supérieures des techniques industrielles (CESTI) - Engineer from the Institut Supérieur des Matériaux et de la Construction Mécanique (ISMCM) - Doctor of Science - Head of Materials Department, Centre Technique des Industries Mécaniques (CETIM)

 INTRODUCTION

Corrosion fatigue can be defined as the combined action of an aggressive environment and cyclic stress, leading to premature metal failure by cracking. In this definition, the term "combined" should be emphasized, since many experimenters have shown that neither cyclic stress in air nor environmental action separately produce the same damage resulting from joint action. In other words, a pre-corroded specimen will not necessarily show an appreciable reduction in fatigue life, and a specimen first fatigued in air will not necessarily lead to an increased rate of metal corrosion.

To illustrate this idea, figure 1 shows the evolution of the fatigue life of E 36 structural steel specimens, as a function of applied cyclic stress (Wöhler curve). The effect of the corrosive medium (synthetic seawater) and the frequency of the loading cycle leads to a drop in fatigue characteristics that is all the greater the lower the cycle frequency. The dashed curves were drawn from the air curves, on the assumption that the effect of corrosion is due solely to a reduction in specimen cross-section as a result of generalized corrosion. Comparison of these curves with the curves obtained during corrosion tests shows that the effect of the corrosive environment is greater than predicted by this assumption.

Comparison of fatigue-corrosion results and strength curves deduced taking into account only mass loss due to corrosion [2]
Figure 1  -  Comparison of fatigue-corrosion results and strength curves deduced taking into account only mass loss due to corrosion [2]

Furthermore, the influence of the material's tensile mechanical properties, which is significant for air fatigue properties, does not appear to be significant for corrosion fatigue properties. Figure 2 compares the fatigue behavior of two carbon steels in air and seawater at 80 C.

In air, the results show an asymptote in stress, corresponding to the endurance limit, the higher the tensile strength....

You do not have access to this resource.

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference

A Comprehensive Knowledge Base, with over 1,200 authors and 100 scientific advisors
+ More than 10,000 articles and 1,000 how-to sheets, over 800 new or updated articles every year
From design to prototyping, right through to industrialization, the reference for securing the development of your industrial projects

This article is included in

Corrosion - Aging

This offer includes:

Knowledge Base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

Practical Path

Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills

Doc & Quiz

Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading

Subscribe now!

Ongoing reading
Corrosion fatigue testing