5. Conclusion
In order to facilitate explanation of the method, the examples presented in this article have been deliberately simplified as far as possible. This method has been tested and applied on TechnipFMC engineering projects using a tool specifically developed in-house.
The method developed by TechnipFMC has the advantage of calculating detection performance taking into account an exhaustive and adaptable list of leak scenarios, with dispersion models for each of them weighted by the associated probabilities of occurrence. It also offers performance comparisons for different detector positions, as well as optimal detector layouts in terms of overall detection performance.
However, it suffers from the same limitations as a quantified risk analysis: the results require highly detailed input data that must be filled in and made reliable (database...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Safety and risk management
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Conclusion
Bibliography
Software tools
DNV GL Process hazard analysis software – Phast
Insight Numerics Detect3D
Kenexis Effigy
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference