Overview
FrançaisRead this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Christophe DUCAMP: Senior expert design for Lifecycle - Airbus Defence and Space – Toulouse – France
INTRODUCTION
The complexity of the systems to be developed and maintained throughout their lifecycle places new demands on manufacturers to guarantee contractual operational and economic performance.
In view of these new constraints, a multi-disciplinary team was set up, involving HSE and CHSCT managers, to identify improvements to be considered in the design of future systems to be developed, industrialized and maintained. Based on the company's repository of processes, methods and tools, one of the areas for improvement concerns the verification of maintenance operations during the design phase, by proposing a simple method for assessing the hazards impacting maintenance operators.
One of the main difficulties encountered during the development phase of a system or product is to demonstrate and guarantee the safety of maintenance operators as the design solutions studied evolve in maturity. The application of global processes within the extended enterprise facilitates the management and technical steering of the final design solution. For example, the technical processes of the IS , the SDF , the SLI , the ARPI, enable the identification and prioritization of technical risks resulting from failure mode analyses, their effects and their criticality.
However, during each design phase, it is always difficult to optimize the choice of architecture for the final product, as this depends on the level of maturity of the technological solutions chosen and their impact on maintenance operations, and therefore on people. Indeed, the hazards that could affect the maintenance operator must be identified and assessed by means of a decision analysis covering all work situations. Consequently, the results of these analyses must be used to define the various actions required to select the most effective solution best suited to the maintenance operator's situation within the framework and in compliance with the norms and standards used within the company....
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Maintenance
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Simplified risk analysis method for maintenance operations (AROM)
Bibliography
Software tools
Pari maintenance: risk analysis program for maintenance operations: http://www.afim.asso.fr
Association Française d'Ingénierie Système : http://www.afis.fr
Standards and norms
Risks
- Gestion de la sûreté de fonctionnement, Partie 3-14: Guide d'application Maintenance et support de maintenance - NF EN 60300-3-14 - 2004
- Principe généraux de conception : Appréciation du risque et réduction du risque - NF EN ISO 12100 - 2010
- Gestion des risques : techniques d'évaluation des risques - NF EN 31010 - 2010
- Système de management de la santé et de la sécurité au travail,...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference