Overview
ABSTRACT
This article presents the different multilateral agreements in force between the various authorities managing recognition, including those technically competent to perform such activities covered by the agreement, such as BIPM in metrology. It outlines the different scopes of these agreements according the type of conformity assessment. It describes only the implementation of these agreements in metrology. A simple procedure designed to avoid any misuse of the agreement mark by a provider trying to sell its services is described, demonstrating the need for all companies to keep metrology updated in-house to support decisions on production risks arising from measuring equipment, and emphasizing that documentation alone does not insure against risk.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Patrick REPOSEUR: Director, Accreditation and Conformity Assessment Consulting (ACAC) - Conformity assessment consultant, Châtillon, France
INTRODUCTION
Since the dawn of time, trade frauds have always guided human exchanges. This is not an expression of despair on my part, but a fact based on documents of good life in common, such as the Bible or the Koran. In both, we find the basis of legal metrology, forbidding fraudulent trade by means of false or "fake" measuring instruments (Bible Deuteronomy 25:13 and Leviticus 19:36; Proverbs 11; Koran Sura 83).
In a "globalized" market, it is therefore logical for some to try to exploit these recognition agreements to their advantage, without taking on the burdens associated with them, such as ISO/CEI 17025 accreditation for calibration laboratories.
The purpose of this article is to draw the reader's attention to what he is entitled to expect, and what he needs to check, in order to be a protected "consumer". Since the entire metrological function cannot be totally outsourced, as it is not an integral part of the production process, it is important for equipment users to ensure the quality of the information transmitted to them prior to use and validation.
This article covers only the fields of conformity assessment, a relatively recent concept when compared with the texts quoted in the first lines of this introduction.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
KEYWORDS
traceability | Calibration
This article is included in
Instrumentation and measurement methods
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
International equivalence of calibration certificates
Bibliography
Standards and norms
- Requirements for the Calibration of Measuring and Test Equipment. - ANSI/NCSL Z540.3 - 2006
- Measurement management systems – Requirements for measurement processes and equipment, AFNOR. - NF EN ISO 10012 - 2003
- Policy on Traceability of Measurement Results. - ILAC P10:01 - 2013
- Conformity assessment – Vocabulary and general principles. - NF EN ISO/CEI 17000 - 2005
- Conformity assessment...
Regulations
Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of July 9, 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference