5. Conclusion
Six academic laboratories have set up a comparative metrology working group within the optics and photonics network of the CNRS mission for cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary initiatives, to share their interferometric measurement methods.
3 mirrors (2 planar and 1 spherical) and 2 roughness standard substrates were exchanged in order to compare different know-how through visits to each of the laboratories.
The results show very good agreement on surface reconstruction for the majority of laboratories. The results show that the measurement procedures used in each laboratory are well mastered. They also highlight the influence of the reference mirror, which cannot be completely eliminated by the "rotation" method. It therefore remains difficult to obtain good measurement results on a mirror whose shape deviations are less than those...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Mechanical and dimensional measurements
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Conclusion
Bibliography
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference