Overview
![](/assets/images/picto-drapeau-france-3a76576a5d60a512053b4612ab58dae5.png)
ABSTRACT
Superhydrophobic and superoleophobic surfaces are usually identified by sessile droplets showing high contact angles and low adhesion. This characterization is, however, not representative of many applications where it is fundamentally important to know the stability of wetting states under conditions that are not simulated by the sessile drop technique. This article presents the different wetting regimes of textured surfaces, some examples of low-wettable surfaces, and the different techniques used as an alternative to the sessile drop to further characterize the wettability of such surfaces.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Laurent VONNA: Senior Lecturer in Materials Chemistry - Institut de Science des Matériaux de Mulhouse (IS2M – CNRS UMR 7361), Mulhouse, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université de Haute Alsace, France
INTRODUCTION
Wettability can be defined as the property of a material to be wetted by a liquid. Controlling the wettability of a material is a fundamental issue for a large number of applications. In addition to chemistry, the adjustment of surface texture is crucial to wettability control. This texture can be used, for example, to shape droplets, direct wetting, and increase or decrease wettability.
The remarkable superhydrophobic properties of lotus leaf, linked to surface microtexture by Neinhuis and Barthlott in the late 1990s, served as a reminder of the extreme non-wetting properties that can be achieved by texturing a surface. Since then, numerous efforts have been made to reproduce such superhydrophobic surfaces, culminating in superoleophobic textures that are not wetted by even low surface tension liquids such as oils.
Progress in the development of non-wetting surfaces has been such that the droplet technique, traditionally used to characterize the wettability of a surface, is no longer applicable to these surfaces, as the wetting angles achieved are very high and the anchoring of the liquid extremely weak or non-existent. What's more, some of the applications promised by these new materials in many cases require characterization of the stability of the air trapped between the material and the liquid, which is responsible for the non-wetting properties. As a result, it soon became necessary to propose alternatives to the drop-on-demand technique for further characterizing the wettability of these surfaces.
The aim of this article is to present techniques for characterizing the wettability of textured surfaces with superhydrophobic and superoleophobic properties, in addition to the classic drop-on-drop technique. It begins with a review of wettability, discussing in particular contact angle and wetting hysteresis, which are the basic experimental parameters for characterizing wettability, and used to qualify non-wetting behavior. It then goes on to describe the different wetting regimes of a textured surface, one of which is responsible for superhydrophobic and superoleophobic behavior. The aim is to enable the reader to differentiate between the different behaviors that can be observed, possibly on the same textured surface. In this context, a reminder is also given of wetting transitions, which demonstrate the instability of the non-wetting state (i.e. the instability of the trapped air at the origin of this behavior), and whose consideration in an experimental approach can make it possible, as we shall see, to qualify the stability of the non-wetting state under different conditions.
Superhydrophobic and superoleophobic surfaces are then defined, introducing historical concepts and presenting examples found in nature,...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
![](/assets/images/logo-eti-286623ed91fa802ce039246e516e5852.png)
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
KEYWORDS
wettability | wetting | superhydrophobic | superoleophobic
This article is included in
Metal treatments
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Wettability of superhydrophobic and superoleophobic surfaces
Bibliography
Standards and norms
- Standard Test Methods for Surface and Interfacial Tension of Solutions of Paints, Solvents, Solutions of Surface-Active Agents, and Related Materials. - ASTM D 1331 -
- Standard performance specification for rainwear and all–purpose, water–repellent coat fabrics. - ASTM D 7017 - janvier 2014
- Étoffes : détermination de la résistance au mouillage superficiel (essai d'arrosage). - NF EN ISO 4920 - janvier 2013 ...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
![](/assets/images/logo-eti-286623ed91fa802ce039246e516e5852.png)
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference