6. Conclusion
Mobile device security is a fast-moving field. Today, perceived security seems more accomplished in Apple environments, at the price of a lack of transparency and a policy of controlling the single Apple Store application store.
In contrast, the Android model offers few security functions by default, and requires a more global approach to the applications to be installed in order to make the terminal more secure. On the other hand, when it comes to managing corporate fleets of terminals, the situation is becoming more balanced thanks to the growing maturity of MDM solutions, and the security functions on offer ensure equivalent protection for both competitors.
Companies also need to learn how to integrate these terminals into their mobility management strategy. The challenge will be to avoid a multiplication of management and supervision...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Security of information systems
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Conclusion
Bibliography
Also in our database
Websites
• Symantec finds big differences in iOS, Android security (John Cox, Network world June 2011) http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/062811-symantec-mobile-report.html
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference