6. Discussion and conclusion
In this article, we have briefly presented some of the concepts of Systems Engineering, and how these concepts have helped us to structure our approach to defining constructability criteria: System Architecture and the distinction between "System to do" and "System to do".
These criteria have been grouped into three families according to the structure of the System for Doing: criteria related to Objectives (§
3
), Activities (§
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Construction law and general management
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Discussion and conclusion
Bibliography
DIRECTORY
Organizations – Federations – Associations (non-exhaustive list)
AFIS – Association française d'ingénierie système
Laboratories – Design offices – Schools – Research centers (non-exhaustive list)
IRC – Institute for Research and Constructability
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference