4. Summary and conclusion
4.1 Conclusion on the example
Machining modeling remains a very tricky field to implement, due to the large deformations and high deformation speeds involved in cutting. The model presented in this study is very local and required several assumptions to achieve results in a reasonable time (between 0.5 and 2 h of calculation per configuration on a PC with a dual-core processor each running at 1.87 GHz).
It is important to note, however, that all this data is realistic. In fact, within the chosen operating ranges (corresponding to the operating point of the cutting edge chipbreaker), the difference between the experimental and simulation results is between 5 and 10%.
The Multi-Parts model improves both calculation stability and contact...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Material processing - Assembly
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Summary and conclusion
Bibliography
Software tools
[FEATURECAM] Delcam http://www.delcam.com
[VIEWMILL] Delcam http://www.delcam.com
[ABAQUS] Dassault Systèmes (SIMULIA) http://www.simulia.com/
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference