4. Conclusion
Although the general classical method developed is open to criticism on a number of points :
use of highly dispersive factors such as K p and K e ;
no possibility of calculating the predicted life of the part for endurances well below the conventional fatigue limit (apart from carrying out tests to plot Wöhler curves);
significant underestimation of actual part performance, as the material's ability to adapt is not taken into account,
it can be used to determine the fatigue limit of a part, even when subjected to combined stresses, provided they are in phase.
It is therefore an important first step for the designer in understanding...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Mechanical functions and components
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Conclusion
Bibliography
References
- (1) - LU (J.), FLAVENOT (J.F.), DIBOINE (A.), LASSERRE (S.), FROUSTEY (C.), BENNEBACH (M.), PALIN-LUC (T.) - Development of a General Multiaxial Fatigue Criterion for High Cycles of Fatigue Behaviour Prediction. - Multiaxial Fatigue and Design, ESIS 21, Edit. by A. Pineau, G. Cailletaud, T.C. Lindley, Mechanical Engineering Publications,...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference