Overview
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHORS
-
André THOMAS: Associate professor, teacher and research tutor at ENSGSI (École nationale supérieure du génie des systèmes industriels) - Certified expert in Value Analysis (CEXV) and Industrial Management (CFPIM)
-
Samir LAMOURI: Lecturer in the Organization and Production Engineering Department at the University of Cergy-Pontoise - Researcher at the Centre de robotique de l'École des mines de Paris, Production Systems team
INTRODUCTION
It's sometimes said that Kanban works on a pull-flow basis and MRP on a push-flow basis. In reality, things aren't quite so simple, because an MRP-type method can very well generate a flow of products on the shop floor whose characteristics approach those of a just-in-time (JIT) pull flow, if sales uncertainty is low, lead times are short, and launches are made as late as possible. Conversely, a Kanban system applied with an excessive number of tickets, on the pretext that the machines must not stop, is more akin to a push flow than a pull flow.
The distinction between push and pull flow is not so much a question of the production scheduling method as of how it is applied:
if production is started at any point in the process, following the order defined by a work schedule, as soon as resources are available (materials, machines, manpower) and without taking into account the short-term needs of the downstream process (or the end consumer), the flow is said to be pushed;
if the decision to produce depends on the short-term needs of the downstream process (or the real needs of the consumer), the flow is said to be pulled.
Push flow reflects the viewpoint of a "producer", who seeks to make the most of his resources by keeping to his delivery schedule. Pull flow reflects the viewpoint of a supplier seeking to deliver the precise service the customer requires.
In the article "Enjeux de la logistique" in this treatise
But how do you actually manage a complex system? This article traces the evolution of MRP (Manufacturing Resource Planning) and DRP (Distribution Resource Planning) push-flow production and distribution planning systems.
Before the advent of MRP and DRP methods, production and distribution management often boiled down to inventory level management. MRP and DRP methods are particularly well suited to industries which manufacture and assemble a large number of components to order, or in small batches, using batch production methods. This is where production flows are the most difficult to manage. These methods are particularly well suited to the mechanical and assembly industries. Extensions have been...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Logistics and Supply Chain
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Push flows: MRP and DRP
Bibliography
References
- (1) - ORLICKY, (J.) - Material Requirements Planning. - New York : McGraw-Hill, 1975.
- (2) - APICS - APICS Dictionary. - APICS 8th edition, 1996.
In Techniques de l'Ingénieur, Logistics section
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference