1. Detectivity and contrast: Robert F. Wagner's theory
In the 1970s-1980s, the scientific community set out to define a figure of merit that would objectively quantify the performance of an X-ray detector. Universally accepted and used, the EQD was the answer to this problem, but it is not sufficient to qualify a complete radiology "system" comprising the detector, the source, etc., but also the radiologist and the patient, for a given modality (mammography, angiography, etc.). Agreeing on an "extended" merit factor has been the focus of a great deal of energy over the past twenty years. Although it is still the subject of debate, and has not yet been introduced in 2015 to qualify commercial products, an answer is emerging quite clearly. QED and MTF remain the ideal factors of merit when it comes to comparing two detectors of the same kind. And for those wishing to quantify the impact of source, detector and image processing, the notions of...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Healthcare technologies
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Detectivity and contrast: Robert F. Wagner's theory
Bibliography
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference