Overview
FrançaisABSTRACT
This article describes the main parameters that quantify the performance of a detector: resolution through the MTF, noise through the NPS, and lastly the signal-to-noise ratio and the now universal factor of merit represented by the DQE. The main sources of noise (electrical and quantum) are described, together with their influence on the signal-to-noise ratio. The article ends with other key parameters for a detector such as lag, speed and acquisition modes.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Thierry LEMOINE: Technical Director Thales microwave & Imaging subsystems, Vélizy, France
INTRODUCTION
This article presents the theoretical foundations of X-ray detector characterization techniques. After a brief but essential reminder of Fourier analysis, it introduces the notion of MTF (Modulation Transfer Function), which measures the resolution performance of a detector, by explaining the contributions of its various components (scintillator and pixel matrix in particular). Next, the notions of quantum and electronic noise are presented, along with the parameter that synthesizes them (the NPS or Wiener function). The various contributions to the NPS (Noise Power Spectrum) are explained, including those linked to the effects of oversampling and spectrum folding in the case of a pixelated detector.
A third section defines the notion of signal-to-noise ratio, initially reduced to an elementary pixel. It is generalized in the fourth part, when NEQ (Noise-Equivalent Quanta) and DQE (Detective Quantum Efficiency) are introduced. The latter is now a universally used factor of merit for quantifying the performance of a digital detector, and measures nothing less than the degradation of the signal-to-noise ratio induced by the detector as a function of spatial frequency. In other words, it quantifies the loss of information attributable to the detector or, to put it another way, it estimates the dose lost at detector level, which will have to be compensated for by a surplus dose at patient level to achieve a given image quality: the higher the QED, the lower the dose to which the patient will be exposed.
At the very end of this article, other important parameters are also briefly introduced, in particular reading speed.
Flat detector technologies, whether direct or indirect detection, are the main theme of this article, but all the concepts presented can be applied to any type of X-ray detector, even if some formulas have to be adapted here and there.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
KEYWORDS
X-ray detectors | DQE | MTS
This article is included in
Healthcare technologies
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Medical X-ray imaging
Bibliography
Standards and norms
- Medical electrical equipment – Characteristics of X-ray imaging equipment – Part 1: Determination of detection quantum efficiency - IEC 62220-1 - 2003
- X-ray medical diagnostic equipment – Radiation conditions for use in determining characteristics - IEC 61267-1 ed2.0 - 2005
- Local and metropolitan area networks – Specific requirements – Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference