Article | REF: C3052 V1

Functional analysis and construction

Author: Christophe GOBIN

Publication date: November 10, 2003, Review date: February 2, 2015

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


Overview

Français

Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.

Read the article

AUTHOR

 INTRODUCTION

For building professionals, functional analysis is often associated with the architectural trend known as functionalism. In the 1960s, the focus was on the intended use of a structure. Notions of life cycle and environment were not as important as they are today. Applying this principle too rigidly led to "suburban sickness", characterized by spatial specialization and significant social segregation.

As a result, a whole area of functional analysis has been overlooked, even though its use in industrial environments has been growing steadily.

This article attempts to summarize the benefits of this method for the construction industry. The interest of this approach is to update a working method that seems appropriate in today's construction context.

Faced with urban problems that place technological solutions in second place, and which require us first to determine the objectives to be met, all those involved in construction feel the need for decision-support tools.

What some call sustainable development is a demanding context that calls for a rethinking of collective work methodologies, since building is by its very nature the result of interventions by a chain of players.

To proceed cumulatively, the first step is to recall the axiom of functional analysis that is commonly shared by its proponents.

"Every object is justified only by the service it provides to a user, enabling him to act on his environment to meet a need."

This statement can be represented by the figure 1 . In another form, we'd say that: rather than defining the object by its constituents (Cartesian approach), it's the results we expect from it that characterize it (constructivist approach).

In fact, functional analysis involves shifting the point of view of the analysis. Figure 2 illustrates this shift in attitude.

This formulation dates back to the 1980s. It corresponds to a gradual evolution of the concept that was formulated in 1947 by Miles when he created value analysis at General Electric.

Based on this understanding, two families of applications can be distinguished. The first aims to characterize specific construction artifacts. The second puts into perspective the capitalization that can be made of them, with the aim of obtaining design tools.

You do not have access to this resource.

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference

A Comprehensive Knowledge Base, with over 1,200 authors and 100 scientific advisors
+ More than 10,000 articles and 1,000 how-to sheets, over 800 new or updated articles every year
From design to prototyping, right through to industrialization, the reference for securing the development of your industrial projects

This article is included in

Construction law and general management

This offer includes:

Knowledge Base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

Practical Path

Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills

Doc & Quiz

Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading

Subscribe now!

Ongoing reading
Functional analysis and construction