Overview
FrançaisABSTRACT
The last decade witnesses of an evolution of both design and assessment practices. In order to assess an existing structure, engineering community classically uses nonlinear constitutive laws.
These tools allow quantifying safety margins in a robust way.
However, this practice is not always used for several reasons: lack of time, unavailability of numerical tools or lack of input data.
This paper aims to give an overview of well-known nonlinear constitutive laws in civil engineering and of associated identification methods.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHORS
-
Benjamin RICHARD: Head of the Structural Performance Modeling and Analysis Laboratory - Service d'Expertise des Équipements et des Structures – Nuclear Safety Division - IRSN (Fontenay-aux-Roses, France)
-
Cédric GIRY: Senior Lecturer. Associate Professor of Civil Engineering - LMT, ENS, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay France
INTRODUCTION
The use of calculation tools has become quite common in the field of civil engineering when it comes to dimensioning a new structure, whatever its intended function. This can be explained by the fact that many different constraints have been imposed on the engineer.
Examples include :
ecological constraints aimed at making new structures more energy-efficient;
or robustness in the event of accidental loading, such as earthquakes.
These various constraints have led to changes in conventional engineering practices, such as the use of new, more insulating materials or the introduction of a redundant structural system. The complexity induced by these constraints has contributed to an increase in the use of conventional structural calculation tools in the design office environment.
However, when it comes to design or dimensioning, these tools are based on the assumption that the behavior of the various materials making up the structure is linear. In the case of existing structures, on the other hand, the problem is generally to assess their level of compliance with the requirements imposed by the public authorities.
In the event of non-compliance, and depending on the function of the structure, it must be brought up to standard. This is particularly true when it comes to the structural resistance of a structure to earthquakes. Safety margins must therefore be assessed in relation to one or more limit states: this is known as "structural assessment".
To achieve this, it is necessary to study the behavior of structures in an operating domain where the assumption of material linearity is no longer verified. In this case, the engineer must use so-called "non-linear" calculation methods. This brings with it a number of problems to which it is essential to be aware.
First of all, the technical and scientific literature can easily attest to the vast amount of work carried out with the aim of representing the fracture behavior of civil engineering materials as faithfully as possible. Today, the laws describing the behavior of steel are recognized as relatively reliable and robust. However, such maturity has not yet been reached when it comes to describing the behavior of concrete under complex loading.
One of the first questions that engineers need to answer is how to select reliable behavior laws whose scope of application they have mastered. Then, because every material is different, it is necessary to particularize the behavior laws selected. This step generally involves determining a number of parameters: this is known as "identification".
...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
KEYWORDS
identification | civil engineering | building | installations safety | nonlinear constitutive laws | structural analysis
This article is included in
The superstructure of the building
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Behavioral laws in structural design
Bibliography
Software tools
CAST3M – Calculation code for finding approximate solutions to systems of differential equations using the finite element method.
French Atomic Energy and Alternative Energies Commission. Center de Saclay.
CASTLAB – Finite element toolbox developed by Benjamin RICHARD et al. under the MatLab environment ® .
Websites
-
CAST3M. Calculation code
-
CASTLAB. Finite element toolbox in MatLab ®
-
Alexandre GANGNANT's personal page
Standards and norms
- Essais pour Béton Durci. Partie 7 : Masse Volumique du Béton, AFNOR. - NF EN 12390-7 - 2001
- Tests for concrete in structures. Part 2: Non-destructive testing – Determination of rebound index, AFNOR. - NF EN 12504-2 - 2003
- Essais pour béton dans les structures. Partie 4 : Détermination de la vitesse de propagation du son, AFNOR. - NF EN 12504-4 - 2005
- Essai pour béton durci. Partie 3 : Résistance...
Regulations
Decree no. 2010-1254 of October 22, 2010 on seismic risk prevention
Arrêté du 22 octobre 2010 relative à la classification et aux règles de construction parasismique applicables aux bâtiments de la classe dite " à risque normal
Directory
Laboratories – Design offices – Schools – Research centers (non-exhaustive list)
-
École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay (Cachan, France)
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire – Laboratoire de modélisation et d'analyse de la performance des structures (Fontenay...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference