Article | REF: C3721 V2

Mechanical movement of people - Specific office needs

Author: Bernard SPORN

Publication date: August 10, 2007

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


Overview

Français

Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.

Read the article

AUTHOR

  • Bernard SPORN: ESME engineer

 INTRODUCTION

Since the 1990s, investors, developers, managers and users of office buildings have been paying particular attention to elevator equipment, whose features contribute to both the quality of life and the "efficiency" of those who use them.

In office buildings and in general, traffic flows are steadily increasing and becoming more complex.

For example:

  • the quest for better internal and external communication has resulted in more people moving around;

  • variable working hours and increased staff mobility mean that peak flows (entry, lunch and exit) are superimposed on heavy inter-floor traffic;

  • the presence of several floors requiring catering increases mid-day traffic.

At the same time, more and more account is being taken of the time "wasted" in elevators, and it is often necessary to meet the three a priori antinomic objectives of minimizing elevator congestion while reducing waiting time (real or perceived) and travel time.The emergence of new technologies in the 1980's facilitated the development, for elevators in batteries, of maneuvers other than those with programmable logic, new maneuvers that could better reconcile the reduction of equipment congestion, waiting time and travel time. While maneuvers with programmable logic are still in use, and the corresponding studies can be carried out in accordance with the approach below, the emergence of other methods of managing user calls and elevators in a battery implies different traffic studies. See 3 for details of these differences.

In all cases, the same analysis scheme should be used as in the previous dossier :

  • physical description of the building ;

  • integration into the urban fabric ;

  • destination ;

  • population by level.

Now that these points have been determined as precisely as possible, it is time to make some working hypotheses:

  • types of activities ;

  • activity rhythms.

From...

You do not have access to this resource.

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference

A Comprehensive Knowledge Base, with over 1,200 authors and 100 scientific advisors
+ More than 10,000 articles and 1,000 how-to sheets, over 800 new or updated articles every year
From design to prototyping, right through to industrialization, the reference for securing the development of your industrial projects

EDITIONS

Other editions of this article are available:


This article is included in

The finishing and equipment of the building

This offer includes:

Knowledge Base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

Practical Path

Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills

Doc & Quiz

Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading

Subscribe now!

Ongoing reading
Mechanical movement of people