9. General conclusion
The criteria for choosing an enrichment process have evolved since the origins of the nuclear industry, but two constants remain: firstly, the group in charge of the project must possess the technology, or at least be able to make a safe bet on its success; and secondly, it must possess the financial resources, either at a cost acceptable to the defense budget, or more or less aimed at profitability for civilian production.
A distinction can be made between the pioneering periods before 1970, when most enrichment was devoted to defense needs, generally under the responsibility of governments, and the period from 1970 to the present day, with growing needs to supply power reactors under the responsibility of private or para-public companies. The first period saw the development of gaseous diffusion (USA, UK, France) and centrifugation (USSR). The early years of the...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Nuclear engineering
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
General conclusion
References
References
Also in our database
Directory
Organizations
USEC Inc. http://www.usec.com/
Nuclear Regulatory Commission http://www.nrc.gov/
Uranium Information Centre http://www.uic.com.au/
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference