Overview
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Francis STOESSEL: Doctorate in engineering from the École nationale supérieure de chimie de Mulhouse (France) - Consulting engineer at Swissi process safety GmbH, Basel, Switzerland - Full Professor at the École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)
INTRODUCTION
Reaction runaways are not uncommon and have a definite destructive potential, which has led to a strengthening of regulatory systems, of which the Seveso Directive is probably the most representative. Assessing the thermal risks inherent in chemical reactions is often difficult because it calls on a number of different disciplines.
• Process design: the operating mode is a key risk factor. Obviously, a batch reaction will be more difficult to control than a semi-batch reaction, where one of the reagents is added as the reaction progresses.
• Chemical engineering: the design and construction of the technical equipment, and the control and regulation elements implemented, play a decisive role in controlling an exothermic reaction. The power of the heating and cooling system is particularly important in this context.
• Chemistry: the nature of the reaction and the properties of the compounds present must be known, not only under the planned operating conditions, but also in the event of deviations from these conditions (e.g. possible secondary reactions, instability of certain compounds, tendency to decompose).
• Physical chemistry and chemical kinetics: the dynamics of a chemical reaction and the physical and chemical properties of reaction mixtures are of paramount importance in any risk assessment.
Understanding and interpreting thermal data is not always easy. This document is intended to guide the reader through the interpretation of thermal data and the assessment of thermal risks by providing a systematic and structured approach – i.e. asking the right questions, giving the right answers derived from thermal analysis data.
To achieve this, we use a selective approach which ensures that all the necessary data has been determined and interpreted correctly. The systematic approach, developed in the safety research laboratory of a major industrial group, is based on a powerful tool: the elaboration of a failure scenario and the determination of criticality classes. It has proved its worth in many industrial companies.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Safety and risk management
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Process thermal safety
Bibliography
Software tools
CHETAH CHETAH. – The ASTM chemical thermodynamic and energy release evaluation program. ASTM, 1916 Race street, Philadelphia, Pa 19103, 1974.
AKTS: Advanced Kintetics and Solutions, AKTS AG http://www.akts.com ,Techno-pôle 3960 Siders, Switzerland
Websites
HARSNET Thematic network on hazard assessment of highly reactive systems http://www.harsnet.net/
Source of physico-chemical data: The NIST chemistry Webbook (National Institute of Standard and Technology) http://www.webbook.nist.go./chemistry
...Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference