Article | REF: SE4053 V1

Fault tree - Temporal aspects

Author: Jean-Pierre SIGNORET

Publication date: December 10, 2017

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


Overview

Français

Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.

Read the article

AUTHOR

  • Jean-Pierre SIGNORET: Dependability specialist - Former chairman of UTE's UF56 commission (operating safety), then of AFNOR (French standards association) - IEC 61025 project manager – Fault tree - Member of TOTAL associate professors - 64160 Sedzère, France

 INTRODUCTION

This article on fault trees (ADDs) follows on from [SE 4052] , which describes the history of ADDs, their Boolean context and their links with other approaches used in the field of operational safety. The article [SE 4052] describes in detail the use of ADDs as a qualitative analysis tool, as well as the mathematical basis for probabilistic calculations related to the failure of the modeled system. The ADD represents a static logic function (i.e. one in which time does not intervene) which essentially calculates, with constant probabilities, the probability of failure of the system modeled as a function of the probabilities of failure of its components.

However, when components evolve independently of each other over time, it is still possible, to a certain extent, to take some temporal aspects into account with this approach. This is the subject of this article, which explains how ADD makes it easy to calculate the unavailability, U(t), of the modeled system as a function of the unavailabilities of its components, U i (t). It also explains how ADD can be used, albeit with more complicated calculations, to obtain the failure frequency, w(t), and the defiabilty, F(t), of the system under study (probability of observing a failure over the duration [0, t]). ADD calculation of the defiabilty, F(t), is generally not possible without approximation.

For a long time, these calculations were limited by the size of the ADDs considered, the power of the computers available and the low efficiency of the algorithms used in the presence of elements repeated several times in the models. These limitations have been overcome since the implementation of binary decision diagrams (BDD). This was first put to good use in the static case [SE 4052] , then for the introduction of temporal aspects and the use of Monte Carlo simulation to assess the impact of uncertainties on DDB input data. These latter points are the...

You do not have access to this resource.

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference

A Comprehensive Knowledge Base, with over 1,200 authors and 100 scientific advisors
+ More than 10,000 articles and 1,000 how-to sheets, over 800 new or updated articles every year
From design to prototyping, right through to industrialization, the reference for securing the development of your industrial projects

This article is included in

Safety and risk management

This offer includes:

Knowledge Base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

Practical Path

Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills

Doc & Quiz

Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading

Subscribe now!

Ongoing reading
Fault tree