3. Comparison of the two approaches

3.1 Selected configuration

A fictitious petrochemical plant is shown in figure 17 . It is assumed to be filled with a cloud of propane in stoichiometric concentration with air (31,000 m ³ ). Three ignition positions are assumed.

For each of the objectives below, a multi-energy approach and a CFD approach will be used.

SCROLL TO TOP

You do not have access to this resource.

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!

The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference

A Comprehensive Knowledge Base, with over 1,200 authors and 100 scientific advisors

+ More than 10,000 articles and 1,000 how-to sheets, over 800 new or updated articles every year

From design to prototyping, right through to industrialization, the reference for securing the development of your industrial projects

This article is included in

Safety and risk management

This offer includes:

Knowledge Base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

Practical Path

Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills

Doc & Quiz

Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading

Subscribe now!

Ongoing reading
Comparison of the two approaches

Previous
page CFD approach

Conclusion

Bibliography

(1) - Van Den BERG (A.C.), MOS (A.L.) - Research to improve guidance on separation distance for the multi energy method. - UK HSE Research Report, 369 (2005).
(2) - EGGEN (J.B.) MM - GAME : development of guidance for the application of the multi-energy...

Software tools

AUTOREAGAS, CFX, FLUENT. ANSYS INC. Southpointe 275 Technology Drive Canonsburg, PA 15317, USA http://www.ansys.com

FLACS – FLame Acceleration Simulator. GEXCON AS Fantoftvegen 38 N-5892 Bergen, Norway http://www.gexcon.com

Regulations

Environment Code – consolidated version as of June 1, 2012

Law no. 2003-699 of 30/07/03 on the prevention of technological and natural risks and the repair of damage, JO no. 175 of 31 July 2003, NOR: DEVX0200176L

Arrêté du 29 septembre 2005 relatif à " l'évaluation et à la prise en compte de la probabilité d'occurrence, de la cinétique, de l'intensité des effets et de la gravité...