Overview
ABSTRACT
Quantification of ignition probabilities is an important step in quantitative risk analysis. In the event of loss of containment with flammable substances, three different cases have to be considered: immediate ignition, deferred ignition and no inflammation. To estimate these probabilities, there are three main approaches. The first is using values from databases, the second implementing semiquantitative approaches, and the third using mathematical models of ranging complexity. After basic reminders about ignition probabilities, this article focuses on major databases and semiquantitative approaches.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Olivier IDDIR: Risk quantification engineer – Member of TECHNIP's network of experts - Expertise and Modelling Department – TECHNIP, La Défense, France
INTRODUCTION
Many industrial facilities store, synthesize or transfer flammable products. Depending on their flammability characteristics, these products are likely to form flammable mixtures in air. In the event of ignition, dangerous phenomena such as fire, flames or explosions can occur.
As part of a quantified risk assessment, it is necessary to be able to evaluate the probability of such hazardous phenomena. To do this, it is possible to use a methodology such as the quantified bow-tie
identify combinations of causes leading to feared events (FEs) that could result in the formation of a flammable mixture (spillage of flammable liquid, venting of flammable gas, etc.);
identify the secondary dreaded events (SDEs) that may occur following the occurrence of the dreaded event, depending on whether or not the risk control measures (RCMs) are fulfilling their safety functions (leakage of flammable product over a limited period or not)
.[SE 4 057]
Once the probabilities of occurrence of the HRAs have been calculated, a probability of ignition must then be assessed in order to estimate those of the hazardous phenomena. As we shall see in this article, there are in fact two ignition probabilities to be assessed: the probability of immediate ignition and the probability of delayed ignition.
After a brief review of the phenomenon of inflammation, the article reviews two approaches to assessing the probability of inflammation:
quantification using values from databases ;
quantification using a semi-quantified method.
Mathematical models will not be discussed in this article, as a dedicated article will be devoted to them, due to their complexity compared to other approaches.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
KEYWORDS
explosion | Ignition probability | immediate ignition | differed ignition
This article is included in
Safety and risk management
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Assessment of ignition probabilities
Bibliography
Digital media
ARIA – Technological accident database.
French Ministry of Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development and Town and Country Planning (MEEDDAT) http://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv
Standards
- Recommended Practice for the Classification of Flammable Liquids, Gases, or Vapors and of Hazardous (Classified) Locations for Electrical Installations in Chemical Process Areas - NFPA 497 -
- Explosive atmospheres – Explosion prevention and protection – Part 1: Basic concepts and methodology - NF EN 1127-1 -
- Explosive atmospheres: substance characteristics for gas and vapour classification – Test methods and data...
Regulations
Arrêté du 29 septembre 2005 relatif à " l'évaluation et à la prise en compte de la probabilité d'occurrence, de la cinétique, de l'intensité des effets et de la gravité des conséquences des accidents potentiels dans les études de dangers des installations classées soumise à autorisation ".
JO n° 234 du 7 octobre 2005 – NOR DEVP0540371A.
Directory
Organizations
Accidental Risk Assessment Methodology for Industries in the framework of SEVESO II directive http://aramis.jrc.it
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) http://www.aiche.org/ccps
...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference