data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19e7f/19e7f3a2845fb13728117aa41fea4d5771e2989d" alt=""
4. Summary of TP composite performance
Table 4 shows the comparative advantages and disadvantages of thermosets and the main families of thermoplastic composites (SFT, LFT, TRE and CLFT).
Table 5 compares the mechanical properties of the main TP composite families.
Among these large families of thermoplastic composites, polyamide (PA), polyester (PET/PBT) and PP resins account for the bulk of SFT applications, while PP represents the bulk of LFT, TRE and CLFT applications.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88978/88978e838df58c04d23694793e62a051df739462" alt=""
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Plastics and composites
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Summary of TP composite performance