Français
7. Comparative studies of expert judgement criticality methods
In the absence of formalized feedback, collective expert judgment is the only possible way of determining criticality, using one of the above methods. The grid in table
5
gives the most useful characteristics for choosing a method for determining equipment criticality. Analysis of this grid shows that the brainstorming method performs less well. This can be explained by the fact that this method relies on superficial knowledge, in the sense of artificial intelligence expert systems
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Maintenance
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Comparative studies of expert judgement criticality methods
Conclusion
Bibliography
Websites
De JONG (H.H.), interesting Eurocontrol site on methods for identifying risks and their criticality http://www.nlr-atsi.nl/downloads/guidelines-for-the-identification-of-hazards.pdf
LINDQVIST (P.), NORDÄNGER (U.-K.), interesting site on e-Delphi methods
Standards and norms
- Evaluation Criteria for reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) Processes - SAE JA 1011 - 1999
- A Guide to the Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Standards - SAE JA 1002 - 2002
- Operator/Manufacturer Scheduled Maintenance Development, rev 2011 - ATA MSG-3 - 2011
- Dependability management –Part 3-11: Application guide – Reliability-based maintenance - CEI 60300-3-11 - 1999
- Reliability-centered...
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
