Article | REF: AG3530 V1

Automation and security

Author: Élie FADIER

Publication date: January 10, 2009, Review date: March 27, 2017 | Lire en français

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!

Automatically translated using artificial intelligence technology (Note that only the original version is binding) > find out more.

    A  |  A

    Overview

    ABSTRACT

    After having briefly recalled the main objectives and characteristics of automated systems, this article focuses in particular on the paradoxes of these systems regarding human activity and security. Indeed, many aspects must be discussed and notably the strong correlation existing between the automation degree and the role of "man", the inverted correlation between technical and human expertise, the opacity of the control system, automation and collective work and also false economies. This article furthermore recommends the implementation of larger designing spaces by adding implantation, operation and dismantling phases in order to achieve a better integration of security within design.

    Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.

    Read the article

    AUTHOR

    • Élie FADIER: French National Institute for Research and Safety (INRS) - Ergonomics and Psychology Applied to Prevention Department (Vandœuvre, France)

     INTRODUCTION

    The increased automation of industrial systems has led to an imbalance between the various human and social components of these systems.

    After a brief review of the main characteristics of automated systems, this dossier highlights some of the paradoxes of automated systems in relation to human activity and safety, drawing on an extensive bibliography.

    It underlines the fact that taking safety into account in automated systems inevitably means factoring in human activity requirements and organizational factors right from the design stage.

    As a result, he recommends broadening the scope of design to include the implementation, operation and decommissioning phases, and thus going beyond technical knowledge alone.

    In addition to complying with the relevant regulations (Directive 89/391/EEC transposed into French law by Law no. 91-1414 and its implementing decree no. 2001-1016, see [Doc. AG 3 530] ), this requires participative ergonomics and the application of the new approach to standardization. Design logic must strike a balance between the autonomy essential to the human operator (adaptability, initiative, etc.), to cope with unforeseen situations, and the rules and procedures structuring the work as a whole.

    You do not have access to this resource.

    Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

    You do not have access to this resource.
    Click here to request your free trial access!

    Already subscribed? Log in!


    The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference

    A Comprehensive Knowledge Base, with over 1,200 authors and 100 scientific advisors
    + More than 10,000 articles and 1,000 how-to sheets, over 800 new or updated articles every year
    From design to prototyping, right through to industrialization, the reference for securing the development of your industrial projects

    This article is included in

    Design and production

    This offer includes:

    Knowledge Base

    Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

    Services

    A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

    Practical Path

    Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills

    Doc & Quiz

    Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading

    Subscribe now!

    Ongoing reading
    Automation and safety