6. Conclusions and outlook
6.1 Model selection
As shown above, a model may be suitable for one process, but give an incorrect result for another application (for example, the Lemaitre-type model gives a good result for wire drawing but not for rolling). ). This first observation stems primarily from the formalism of the model, which can be adapted to processes with strong or moderate triaxialities. However, as indicated in paragraph
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Metal forming and foundry
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Conclusions and outlook
Bibliography
Events
ICF – International Conference on Fracture
ECF – European Conference on Fracture
CFRAC – Conference on Computational Modeling of Fracture and Failure of Materials and Structures
Numiform – International Conference on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes
Esaform – International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming...
International scientific journals
IJFO – International Journal of Material Forming
JMPT – Journal of Materials Processing Technology
EFM – Engineering Fracture Mechanics
IJDM – International Journal of Damage Mechanics
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference