3. Conclusion
The inclusion of the signature in the support of a construction project reflects the concomitance of two developments that deserve to be highlighted. The first relates to its industrial dimension, the second to scientific development.
The adoption of this approach by the construction sector reflects a gradual collective awareness of the complex nature of the product concerned. Traditionally, the built environment has been regarded as a highly inert object, with little inclination to innovation and rather backward-looking practices. But it is gradually becoming clear that a systemic vision is needed to take a completely new look at the building.
Interactions at different scales between a building and its environment, and between it and the neighborhood, are now essential and need to be mastered if they are to be constructive.
...Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Construction law and general management
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Conclusion
Bibliography
Websites
-
AIMCC – Unions and federations representing industrial manufacturers of construction-related products
-
CESBA – Collective bottom-up European initiative providing knowledge on harmonized built environment assessment
...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference