Français
3. Critique of ISO 31010 method no. 29 and future prospects
This third part begins with the criticisms of the method as a high-performance risk management method and, more generally, as a method suited to efficiency in risk and uncertainty management situations, because, as we have seen, it was not designed for this purpose.
Secondly, we summarize the criticisms from the point of view of risk identification, analysis, assessment and treatment.
3.1 Other reviews identified
Paradoxically, there aren't many references in the literature suggesting that ISO 31010 method no. 29 should be re-evaluated to contribute to effective risk management.
...
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Construction law and general management
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Critique of ISO 31010 method no. 29 and future prospects
Conclusion
Bibliography
Digital media
IMDR Institut de Maîtrise des Risques – DVD, Reliabiliste: the story of a singular profession
Websites
-
AMF – Autorité des Marchés Financiers
-
COSO
-
ECSS – The...
Events
Lambda Mu conferences, Institut de Maîtrise des Risques
Standards and norms
- Management du risque : Principes et lignes Directrices. - ISO. ISO 31000 :2009 - Novembre 2009
- Management du risque : vocabulaire. - ISO. FD ISO guide 73 - Décembre 2009
- Gestion des risques : Techniques d'évaluation des risques. - ISO. ISO/CEI 31010 :2009 - Novembre 2009
- System reliability analysis techniques – Procedures for analyzing failure modes and their effects. - CEI. CEI 60812 - (2006) ...
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
